Insider threat: identifying and fighting them
Home » Insider threat: identifying and fighting them
Insider threat: identifying and fighting them
Insider threats are difficult to spot because they come from within your organization. Employees, contractors and partners require different levels of login credentials in order to perform their work. Attackers can trick these insiders into accessing them or offering them money to knowingly steal valuable information from the company.
Traditional security solutions focus on protecting the organization from external attackers. This strategy overlooks the damage that an internal resource could do to the organization, whether aware or not. With a Nextgen SIEM solution you have the ability to detect and respond to both external and internal threats, with the help of the UEBA in identifying suspicious behavior.
Insider threat, the reasons
Employees or contractors identified as at risk are linked to 60% of cases of insider threats, increasing the likelihood that such incidents result in the theft of sensitive company data. Insider threats can be divided into two groups: the distracted and the hostile.
The mechanics of an attack change significantly based on the motivations behind it. It is therefore better to fully understand which characteristics are typical of the motivations behind attacks, in order to be able to stop potential threats before they become violations.
Economic gain
It is clear to each employee how much the data that the company holds can be worth. Here, in the event of a crisis, allowing data to be leaked in exchange for money may seem like a reduced risk. This type of motive must be considered above all when, in times like the present one, an external event (the COVID-19 pandemic) still puts the workplace at risk. With the risk of an imminent layoff, the sale of data that you have access to as an employee is a more than attractive escape route.
Carelessness
Non-compliance with security rules is a very real risk and the most common cause of internal threats. Indolence in compliance with the rules costs organizations an average of $ 4.58mln per year. Threats come, specifically, from some security practices that are not respected, such as failure to log out from the system, writing one’s passwords on paper or reusing them. In this category there are also violations in the use of unauthorized software or a failure to protect company data.
The reasons behind these harmful behaviors are often, unfortunately, particularly simple: security is bypassed by an allegedly greater speed, productivity or, worse, laziness.
Distraction
One type of negligent employee is the distracted one, which is worth treating in isolation because it is more complicated to identify. While the serial behavior of violating the rules is easily identifiable, the distracted, who normally diligently complies with the regulations, is not identified before the only, unfortunate, time when his carelessness does not cost the company an attack that went to successful.
Damage to the company
Among the most subtle insider threats are those of those who have the sole purpose of damaging the company. The motive, in these cases, is usually of a personal nature: an employee who is refused a raise, a disagreement with a superior, etc. The insider then moves to discredit his company, causing damage to its image that results in frightened investors who withdraw their capital or lose customers.
Sabotage and sale of information to third parties
For companies that handle sensitive data, this type of threat is a real risk. Whether the company deals with valuable intellectual property or sensitive data of its customers, there is a high probability that there are those who are interested in having access to that data to use it to their advantage. In this scenario, the actor who wants to get hold of the data recruits an insider to steal it.
Cases that fall under the definition of espionage or media sabotage have been on the rise in recent years. Attacks start from nations such as Russia or North Korea, often involved in this type of trafficking in order to gain political advantages against Western states and organizations.
Defense against insider threats
The defense against attacks that originate from the inside is based on the analysis of the suspicious behavior of those who have access to the systems. The difficulty is found in the non-violent nature of the attacks. It is easy for insiders to not need to breach any security checks, having access from the start.
So how can we immediately catch the threats?
Monitor user access
Insiders with legitimate access choose to abuse their access privileges. Excessive access rights are often granted to reduce the effort that privilege management requires. Avoiding this type of behavior is already a first step in a proactive direction of defense.
Furthermore, with a Nextgen SIEM system it is possible to monitor users with high privilege access to databases, servers and critical applications. At that point it is easier to identify those who abuse their access.
Detect suspicious user behavior
The most sophisticated attacks are based on stealth. To this end, attackers increasingly rely on the compromise of existing internal resources. Once inside the network, they perform lateral movement and steal data under the guise of an internal user.
A system such as that offered by SOD’s SOCaaS allows, among other things, to quickly identify suspicious accounts by detecting abnormal user behavior compared to normal base patterns and the activity of colleagues.
The advantages of a modern system
Shorter response time
Using behavioral analysis it is possible to identify abnormal actions so that we can investigate very quickly.
Advanced behavioral analysis: with the UEBA system (included in SOCaaS), security analysts are able to monitor access and activity of users to the most important resources of the company, allowing to find internal threats with the minimal noise for fast detection and response.
Rapid recognition of users at risk
To enable rapid detection of insider threats, security teams need the ability to link a user’s accounts together to create a universal user profile. This is possible with a Nextgen SIEM system. The analysis of user behavior is also compared to that of a group of peers, to identify anomalous behaviors with greater precision, understanding how a user’s activity is different from that of his colleagues.
The threats that start from within the company perimeter are perhaps the most risky due to their low noise nature. Fortunately, with systems increasingly capable of detecting suspicious behavior and aggregating large amounts of employee data, it is possible to take effective countermeasures to combat this type of attack.
Useful links:
Share
RSS
More Articles…
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network
- Ransomware: a plague that brings companies and institutions to their knees. Should you pay the ransom? Here is the answer.
- Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity
- Red Team, Blue Team and Purple Team: what are the differences?
- Mercedes’ Oversight Puts Company Secrets at Risk: Why Cyber Threat Intelligence is Critical
- SOC vs MDR: Complete Guide to Comparing Security Operations Center and Managed Detection and Response
Categories …
- Backup as a Service (18)
- Acronis Cloud Backup (11)
- Veeam Cloud Connect (4)
- Cloud Conference (3)
- Cloud CRM (1)
- Cloud Server/VPS (22)
- Conferenza Cloud (4)
- ICT Monitoring (5)
- Log Management (2)
- News (24)
- ownCloud (4)
- Privacy (7)
- Secure Online Desktop (14)
- Security (202)
- Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) (8)
- Deception (4)
- Ethical Phishing (11)
- Netwrix Auditor (2)
- Penetration Test (11)
- Posture Guard (3)
- SOCaaS (65)
- Vulnerabilities (84)
- Web Hosting (15)
Tags
darkreading
- Redgate Launches Enterprise Edition of Redgate Monitor April 17, 2024
- Dangerous ICS Malware Targets Orgs in Russia and Ukraine April 17, 2024"Kapeka" and "Fuxnet" are the latest examples of malware to emerge from the long-standing conflict between the two countries.
- Active Kubernetes RCE Attack Relies on Known OpenMetadata Vulns April 17, 2024Once attackers have control over a workload in the cluster, they can leverage access for lateral movement both inside the cluster and to external resources.
- Ivanti Releases Fixes for More Than 2 Dozen Vulnerabilities April 17, 2024Users will need to download the latest version of Ivanti's Avalanche to apply fixes for all of the bugs.
- Various Botnets Pummel Year-Old TP-Link Flaw in IoT Attacks April 17, 2024Moobot, Miori, AGoent, and a Gafgyt variant have joined the infamous Mirai botnet in attacking unpatched versions of vulnerable Wi-Fi routers.
- Preparing for Cyber Warfare: 6 Key Lessons From Ukraine April 17, 2024Having a solid disaster recovery plan is the glue that keeps your essential functions together when all hell breaks loose.
- Why a Native-First Approach Is Key to Cloud Security April 17, 2024A native-first approach delivers better protections and a more efficient use of resources than best-of-breed solutions, benefiting cloud service providers and end-user customers alike.
- 'Sandworm' Group Is Russia's Primary Cyberattack Unit in Ukraine April 17, 2024But even with that focus, the sophisticated threat group has continued operations against targets globally, including the US, says Google's Mandiant.
- Israeli Defense Forces Hold Hybrid Cyber & Military Readiness Drills April 17, 2024Israel prepares for a response to Iran's April 14 drone and missile attack.
- Delinea Fixes Flaw, but Only After Analyst Goes Public With Disclosure First April 16, 2024Delinea rolls out Secret Server SOAP API flaw fixes, while researcher claims the vendor ignored his findings for weeks.
Full Disclosure
- CVE-2024-31705 April 14, 2024Posted by V3locidad on Apr 14CVE ID: CVE-2024-31705 Title : RCE to Shell Commands" Plugin / GLPI Shell Command Management Interface Affected Product : GLPI - 10.X.X and last version Description: An issue in Infotel Conseil GLPI v.10.X.X and after allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the insufficient validation of user-supplied input. […]
- SEC Consult SA-20240411-0 :: Database Passwords in Server Response in Amazon AWS Glue April 14, 2024Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 14SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240411-0 > ======================================================================= title: Database Passwords in Server Response product: Amazon AWS Glue vulnerable version: until 2024-02-23 fixed version: as of 2024-02-23 CVE number: - impact: medium homepage: https://aws.amazon.com/glue/ found:...
- [KIS-2024-03] Invision Community <= 4.7.16 (toolbar.php) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability April 11, 2024Posted by Egidio Romano on Apr 10------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invision Community
- [KIS-2024-02] Invision Community <= 4.7.15 (store.php) SQL Injection Vulnerability April 11, 2024Posted by Egidio Romano on Apr 10-------------------------------------------------------------------- Invision Community
- Multiple Issues in concretecmsv9.2.7 April 11, 2024Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Apr 10# Exploit Title: Multiple Web Flaws in concretecmsv9.2.7 # Date: 4/2024 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 9.2.7 # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: http://msecureltd.blogspot.com Verbose Error Message - Stack Trace: 1. Directly browse to edit profile page 2. Error should come up with verbose stack trace […]
- OXAS-ADV-2024-0001: OX App Suite Security Advisory April 11, 2024Posted by Martin Heiland via Fulldisclosure on Apr 10Dear subscribers, We're sharing our latest advisory with you and like to thank everyone who contributed in finding and solving those vulnerabilities. Feel free to join our bug bounty programs for OX App Suite, Dovecot and PowerDNS at YesWeHack. This advisory has also been published at https://documentation.open-xchange.com/appsuite/security/advisories/html/2024/oxas-adv-2024-0001.html. […]
- Trojan.Win32.Razy.abc / Insecure Permissions (In memory IPC) April 11, 2024Posted by malvuln on Apr 10Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/0eb4a9089d3f7cf431d6547db3b9484d.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Trojan.Win32.Razy.abc Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions (In memory IPC) Family: Razy Type: PE32 MD5: 0eb4a9089d3f7cf431d6547db3b9484d SHA256: 3d82fee314e7febb8307ccf8a7396b6dd53c7d979a74aa56f3c4a6d0702fd098 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0678...
- CVE-2023-27195: Broken Access Control - Registration Code in TM4Web v22.2.0 April 11, 2024Posted by Clément Cruchet on Apr 10CVE ID: CVE-2023-27195 Description: An access control issue in Trimble TM4Web v22.2.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to access a specific crafted URL path to retrieve the last registration access code and use this access code to register a valid account. If the access code was used to create an Administrator […]
- [CFP] IEEE CSR Workshop on Cyber Forensics& Advanced Threat Investigations in Emerging Technologies 2024 April 5, 2024Posted by Andrew Zayine on Apr 05Dear Colleagues, IEEE CSR Workshop on Cyber Forensics and Advanced Threat Investigations in Emerging Technologies organizing committee is inviting you to submit your research papers. The workshop will be held in Hybrid mode. The in-person mode will held at Hilton London Tower Bridge, London from 2 to 4 September […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Agent.ju (PSYRAT) / Authentication Bypass RCE April 5, 2024Posted by malvuln on Apr 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/0e6e40aad3e8d46e3c0c26ccc6ab94b3.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Agent.ju (PSYRAT) Vulnerability: Authentication Bypass RCE Family: PSYRAT Type: PE32 MD5: 0e6e40aad3e8d46e3c0c26ccc6ab94b3 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0677 Disclosure: 04/01/2024 Description: The PsyRAT 0.01 malware listens on...
Customers
Twitter FEED
Recent activity
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes L'impatto crescente delle minacce informatiche, su sistemi operativi privati op… https://t.co/FimxTS4o9G
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The growing impact of cyber threats, on private or corporate operating systems… https://t.co/y6G6RYA9n1
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Tempo di lettura stimato: 6 minuti Today we are talking about the CTI update of our services. Data security is… https://t.co/YAZkn7iFqa
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes Il tema della sicurezza delle informazioni è di grande attualità in questo peri… https://t.co/tfve5Kzr09
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The issue of information security is very topical in this historical period ch… https://t.co/TP8gvdRcrF
Newsletter
{subscription_form_1}Products and Solutions
News
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself April 17, 2024
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security April 15, 2024
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network March 25, 2024
- Ransomware: a plague that brings companies and institutions to their knees. Should you pay the ransom? Here is the answer. March 6, 2024
- Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity March 4, 2024
Google Reviews
Ottima azienda, servizi molto utili, staff qualificato e competente. Raccomandata!read more
Ottimo supportoread more
E' un piacere poter collaborare con realtà di questo tiporead more
Un ottimo fornitore.
Io personalmente ho parlato con l' Ing. Venuti, valore aggiunto indubbiamente.read more
© 2023 Secure Online Desktop s.r.l. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: via dell'Annunciata 27 – 20121 Milan (MI), Operational Office: via statuto 3 - 42121 Reggio Emilia (RE) – PEC [email protected] Tax code and VAT number 07485920966 – R.E.A. MI-1962358 Privacy Policy - ISO Certifications