Audit IT Piergiorgio Venuti

Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Introduction

Cybersecurity has become a major concern for modern businesses. With the increase in cyber attacks, data breaches and privacy threats, organizations must take proactive measures to protect their systems and data. Two key components of any cybersecurity program are IT audit and log management. But what is the difference between these two aspects? And why are both necessary?

What is an IT audit?

An IT audit is a process of checking security controls, configurations and vulnerabilities within an organization’s IT infrastructure and systems. Audits are conducted on a periodic basis by internal or external auditors to identify risks, weaknesses and areas for improvement.

Common elements of an IT audit include:

  • Check network and security configurations
  • Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing
  • Review of access controls and policies
  • Evaluation of update and patch management
  • Inspection of incident management and response plans

Audits provide a periodic snapshot of the security posture and help ensure regulatory compliance. However, they do not provide continuous monitoring and visibility.

What is log management?

Log Management

Log management refers to the centralized collection, storage and analysis of logs generated by IT systems, applications and network devices. Logs record user and system activity and are a vital source of security data and information.

The main capabilities of a log management solution include:

  • Collection and centralization of logs from heterogeneous sources
  • Secure long-term log storage
  • Real-time correlation of suspicious events and activities
  • Dashboards and reporting for visibility and monitoring
  • Configurable alarms and warnings
  • Log analysis for investigations and forensics

Log management provides continuous monitoring and visibility into threats and anomalous activities. However, it does not perform proactive checks of security controls.

Key differences

While audit and log management are both critical to an effective security program, there are some key differences:

Frequency – Audits are periodic. Log management is continuous and in real time.

Approach – Audits are proactive, timely checks. Log management is passive and reactive.

Perspective – Audits provide a cross-sectional snapshot. Logs provide a longitudinal view over time.

Coverage – Audits are limited in time and scope. Log management monitors the entire environment.

Output – Audits produce static reports. Logs enable dynamic analysis.

Costs – Audits require ongoing human resources. Log management automates with lower costs.

Benefits of a managed service

For both IT audit and log management, organizations can choose to implement an in-house solution or rely on managed service providers. Managed services offer several benefits:

  • Experience – Specialized suppliers with in-depth expertise and established best practices.
  • Resources – Access to advanced technologies and dedicated teams of professionals.
  • Scalability – Elastic capabilities to meet changing needs.
  • Efficiencies – Automation and optimization of processes for greater productivity.
  • Compliance – Support meeting compliance standards and frameworks.
  • Costs – Converting fixed costs into flexible operating expenses.
  • Focus – Freeing up time and resources to focus on your core business.

Whether you choose audit or log management, managed services eliminate complexity and allow you to delegate these critical capabilities to trusted partners.

Considerations for choosing a managed service

When selecting a managed service provider, organizations should consider:

  • Coverage – Breadth and depth of functionality and visibility provided.
  • Skills – Level of experience with relevant technologies and standards.
  • Size – Scale and capacity to handle growing volumes and needs.
  • Security – Rigorous controls to protect data confidentiality.
  • Flexibility – Customization to fit specific needs.
  • Reporting – Clear dashboards and reports for relevant metrics and insights.
  • Support – Availability of expert staff for assistance and advice.
  • Pricing – Transparent and predictable pricing models.
  • Integrations – Ability to incorporate with existing tools.

By choosing carefully, organizations can obtain comprehensive and effective audit and log management services on an ongoing basis.

Internal management vs outsourcing

Organizations must decide whether to manage these capabilities internally or outsource:

Internal management

  • Greater control and customization
  • Internal network of dedicated staff
  • Maintenance of internal skills

Outsourcing

  • Instant access to skills and experience
  • No hiring or training requirements
  • Transfer of complexity and responsibility
  • Cost reduction through economies of scale

Outsourcing is often more beneficial for SMEs, while large enterprises can gain value from a hybrid approach.

IT audit and log management play complementary but distinct roles in a cybersecurity program. Audits provide proactive cross-sectional assessments of security posture, while log management enables ongoing monitoring and analysis. Fully managed services offer specialized expertise, streamlined operations, and elastic capabilities for both audits and log management. By choosing a reliable provider, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity without complexity or excessive expense.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • secuvera-SA-2024-02: Multiple Persistent Cross-Site Scritping (XSS) flaws in Drupal-Wiki May 6, 2024
    Posted by Simon Bieber via Fulldisclosure on May 06secuvera-SA-2024-02: Multiple Persistent Cross-Site Scritping (XSS) flaws in Drupal-Wiki Affected Products Drupal Wiki 8.31 Drupal Wiki 8.30 (older releases have not been tested) References https://www.secuvera.de/advisories/secuvera-SA-2024-02.txt (used for updates) CVE-2024-34481 CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CVSS-B: 6.4 (...
  • OXAS-ADV-2024-0002: OX App Suite Security Advisory May 6, 2024
    Posted by Martin Heiland via Fulldisclosure on May 06Dear subscribers, We're sharing our latest advisory with you and like to thank everyone who contributed in finding and solving those vulnerabilities. Feel free to join our bug bounty programs for OX App Suite, Dovecot and PowerDNS at YesWeHack. This advisory has also been published at https://documentation.open-xchange.com/appsuite/security/advisories/html/2024/oxas-adv-2024-0002.html. […]
  • Microsoft PlayReady toolkit - codes release May 6, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on May 06Hello All, We released codes for "Microsoft PlayReady toolkit", a tool that has been developed as part of our research from 2022: https://security-explorations.com/microsoft-playready.html#details The toolkit illustrates the following: - fake client device identity generation, - acquisition of license and content keys for encrypted content, - downloading and decryption of […]
  • Live2D Cubism refusing to fix validation issue leading to heap corruption. May 3, 2024
    Posted by PT via Fulldisclosure on May 03Live2D Cubism is the dominant "vtuber" software suite for 2D avatars for use in livestreaming and integrating them in other software. They publish various SDKs and a frameworks for integrating their libraries with your own program. You're supposed to use those to deserialize and render/animate the models created […]
  • Microsoft PlayReady white-box cryptography weakness May 1, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on May 01Hello All, There is yet another attack possible against Protected Media Path process beyond the one involving two global XOR keys [1]. The new attack may also result in the extraction of a plaintext content key value. The attack has its origin in a white-box crypto [2] implementation. More […]
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 87): shipping more rotten software to billions of unsuspecting customers April 24, 2024
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Apr 24Hi @ll, this post is a continuation of and With the release of .NET Framework 4.8 in April 2019, Microsoft updated the following paragraph of the MSDN article "What's new in .NET Framework" | Starting with .NET Framework 4.5, the clrcompression.dll assembly...
  • Response to CVE-2023-26756 - Revive Adserver April 24, 2024
    Posted by Matteo Beccati on Apr 24CVE-2023-26756 has been recently filed against the Revive Adserver project. The action was taken without first contacting us, and it did not follow the security process that is thoroughly documented on our website. The project team has been given no notice before or after the disclosure. Our team has […]
  • BACKDOOR.WIN32.DUMADOR.C / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) April 19, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Apr 19Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6cc630843cabf23621375830df474bc5.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Dumador.c Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware runs an FTP server on TCP port 10000. Third-party adversaries who can reach the server can send a specially […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20240418-0 :: Broken authorization in Dreamehome app April 19, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 19SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240418-0 > ======================================================================= title: Broken authorization product: Dreamehome app vulnerable version:
  • MindManager 23 - full disclosure April 19, 2024
    Posted by Pawel Karwowski via Fulldisclosure on Apr 19Resending! Thank you for your efforts. GitHub - pawlokk/mindmanager-poc: public disclosure Affected application: MindManager23_setup.exe Platform: Windows Issue: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI installer Repair Mode (EXE hijacking race condition) Discovered and reported by: Pawel Karwowski and Julian Horoszkiewicz (Eviden Red Team) Proposed mitigation:...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}