Business email compromise (BEC) schemes
Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
Over the years, scammers have stolen millions of dollars from businesses by compromising their official email accounts and using them to request fraudulent wire transfers . Technically these schemes, which are in effect scams, are called Business Email Compromise .
There has been an increase in cyber intrusions related to Business Email Compromise schemes, involving scammers posing as executives . Contact is made by sending phishing e-mails from seemingly legitimate sources and then wire transfers to fraudulent accounts are requested. These methods ultimately lead to intrusion and unrestricted access to their victims’ credentials.
What is meant by Business Email Compromise?
The FBI defines Business Email Compromise (BEC) as a sophisticated scam that targets companies that work with foreign suppliers and companies that regularly make payments by wire transfer. Formerly known as Man-in-the-Email scams, these schemes compromise official corporate email accounts to conduct unauthorized funds transfers.
According to the FBI, victims lost more than $ 750 million and affected more than 7,000 people between October 2013 and August 2015. Globally, cybercriminals defrauded more than $ 50 million from victims in non-American countries.
How does it work?
BEC scams often start with an attacker compromising a business executive’s email account or any publicly listed business email. This is usually done using a keylogger or phishing methods , where attackers create a domain that is similar to the corporate one they are targeting. In other cases, a spoofed email tricking the target into providing account details is sufficient.
After monitoring the compromised email account, the scammer will try to determine who initiates the wire transfers and who requests them . Scammers often carry out a fair amount of research, looking for a company that has had a leadership change in the financial function management, where executives are on the road, or conducts conference calls for investors. Attackers use these as opportunities to execute the pattern.
At this point, the attack can be done in several ways.
Version 1: The bogus invoice
This release, which has also been called “ The Bogus Invoice Scheme “, “ The Supplier Swindle “, and “ Invoice Modification Scheme “usually involves a company that has a stable relationship with a supplier . The scammer asks to transfer the funds for the payment of the bill to an alternative and fraudulent account by e-mail, telephone or fax.
Version 2: CEO Fraud
In this version, scammers identify themselves as senior executives (CFO, CEO, CTO, etc.), lawyers or other types of legal representatives and claim to handle confidential matters or urgent and require you to make a wire transfer to an account they control. In some cases, the fraudulent wire transfer request is sent directly to the financial institution with instructions to urgently send the funds to another institution. This scam is also known as “ CEO Fraud “, “ Business Executive Scam “, “ Masquerading “, and “ Financial Industry Wire Frauds “.
Version 3: Account Compromise
Similar to the other two versions, an employee email account is hacked and then used to make requests for payment of bills to bank accounts controlled by scammers . Messages are sent to multiple vendors identified from the employee’s contact list. The company may not be aware of the scheme until their suppliers perform checks on the invoice payment status.
Version 4: The fake lawyer
In this version, the cybercriminal contacts employees and / or the CEO of the company and identifies himself as a lawyer or representative of a law firm, claiming to handle confidential and urgent matters. This contact, typically made by phone or email, prompts the contacted party to act quickly or covertly in handling the transfer of funds.
This type of Business Email Compromise pattern can be scheduled to occur at the end of the day or work week, when employees are preparing to quit and therefore are particularly sensitive to a situation. emergency.
Version 5: Data theft
This scheme involves emails from employees with specific roles in the company used to send requests . This time, however, the requests are not for transfers of funds but for personally identifiable information of other employees and executives . This variant can therefore serve as a starting point for more elaborate and malicious BEC attacks against the company.
The scam is primarily social engineering and generally does not need sophisticated system penetration . Unlike phishing scams, emails used in BEC scams are not sent in bulk to avoid being reported as spam . Victims are tricked into making transfers, usually instructed to act quickly and confidentially when transferring funds.
Some known cases
In March 2016, an increasing number of companies and businesses suffered damage from BEC schemes. Companies like Seagate and Snapchat have been among the victims of email scams using the same modus operandi . At the end of the same month, San Francisco-based Pivotal Software was hacked through a phishing scheme that leaked an unknown amount of employee tax information .
The breach was initiated by an email that appeared to come from company CEO Rob Mee, requesting information about the company’s personnel. This resulted in the delivery of the employee information W-2 . This information included addresses, previous year’s income details, social security numbers and individual taxpayer identification numbers. The recipient of the data, needless to say, was not authorized to request or receive data of this nature.
Not long after this incident, similar schemes were used to obtain personal information in the education sector. W-2 information of 3,000 employees at Tidewater Community College, Virginia was leaked. The event was sparked by a request message from the principal of Kentucky State University, received by one of the school staff members. The request prompted staff to forward a list of employees and students along with W-2 information.
Scams involving the theft of personal information via phishing emails have proven to be an inexhaustible source of data. The stolen data could be sold and also used to stage future attacks or identity theft. As seen in recent and previous tax scams, email scams have become one of the fastest ways to fool unwitting users.
How to defend yourself?
The advice is always the same: stay vigilant and educate employees on how to avoid being victims of BEC scams and other phishing attacks .
It’s important to know that cybercriminals don’t care about the size of your company. Indeed, usually, the more victims there are, the better. These types of scammers don’t need to be highly technical as they can find tools and services that meet all levels of technical proficiency in the deep web . As the world relies more and more on cloud services and in general linked to each other, a single compromised account is all it takes to obtain large amounts of money or data from a company .
- Review all emails carefully. Be wary of emails sent by company executives, as they are often used to trick employees into taking urgent action. Review emails requesting funds transfer to determine if requests are irregular.
- Educate and train employees . While employees are a company’s greatest asset, they are usually also the weakest link when it comes to security . Make a commitment to train employees according to the best practices of the company. Remind them that adhering to company policies is one thing, but developing good safety habits is another. For this we offer a ethical phishing service geared towards education against Business Email Compromise schemes and phishing in general.
- Stay up to date with customer habits , including details and reasons for payments.
- If you suspect that you have been the victim of a BEC email, < strong> immediately report the incident to the police. Also, alert your company so they can raise their guard and tighten controls.
SOD can help you train your employees. Find out how by contacting us, we will be happy to answer any questions.
- The SOAR benefits: simplifying investigation and response
- Security Code Review: How the service works
- Integration of the automated response: the automations in SOCaaS
- Coordination between CTI and SOC: how to further raise the defenses
- New Cloud Server: redundant internet
- Quality certificate for the SOCaaS of SOD
- Managed Detection and Response: a new preventive approach
- CLUSIT: our collaboration for better services
- Backup as a Service (17)
- Acronis Cloud Backup (11)
- Veeam Cloud Connect (4)
- Cloud Conference (3)
- Cloud CRM (1)
- Cloud Server/VPS (22)
- Conferenza Cloud (4)
- ICT Monitoring (5)
- Log Management (2)
- News (21)
- ownCloud (4)
- Privacy (7)
- Secure Online Desktop (14)
- Security (170)
- Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) (6)
- Ethical Phishing (8)
- Penetration Test (5)
- SOCaaS (55)
- Vulnerabilities (84)
- Web Hosting (15)
- Verizon DBIR: Social Engineering Breaches Double, Leading to Spiraling Ransomware Costs June 6, 2023Ransomware continues its runaway growth with median payments reaching $50,000 per incident.
- Researchers Spot a Different Kind of Magecart Card-Skimming Campaign June 6, 2023In addition to injecting a card skimmer into target Magento, WooCommerce, Shopify, and WordPress sites, the the threat actor is also hijacking targeted domains to deliver the malware to other sites.
- Microsoft Preps $425M Payment for LinkedIn GDPR Violations June 6, 2023The company plans on disputing these fines once a final decision is made, but warned shareholders that it set aside the funds to pay it, nonetheless.
- With SEC Rule Changes on the Horizon, Research Reveals Only 14% of CISOs Have Traits Desired for Cyber Expert Board Positions June 6, 2023
- ILTA and Conversant Group Release Cybersecurity Benchmarking Survey of the Legal Industry June 6, 2023Joint research highlights disconnect between legal IT and recommended cybersecurity practices.
- Netskope Intelligent SSE Selected by Transdev to Secure and Connect its Hybrid Workforce June 6, 2023Implementation is part of Transdev's Cloud-First approach to better manage technological obsolescence.
- Filling the Gaps: How to Secure the Future of Hybrid Work June 6, 2023By enhancing remote management and adopting hardware-enforced security, productivity can continue without inviting extra cyber-risk.
- US Aerospace Contractor Hacked With 'PowerDrop' Backdoor June 6, 2023Hackers used a little to do a lot, cracking a high-value target with hardly more than the living-off-the-land tools (PowerShell especially) found on any standard Windows computer.
- ChatGPT Hallucinations Open Developers to Supply Chain Malware Attacks June 6, 2023Attackers could exploit a common AI experience — false recommendations — to spread malicious code via developers that use ChatGPT to create software.
- Red Sift Launches Relevance Detection as GPT-4-Powered Asset Discovery and Classification Solution June 5, 2023New AI feature enhances OnDOMAIN's capabilities to secure unknown vulnerabilities and strengthen network security posture.
- [CVE-2023-29459] FC Red Bull Salzburg App "at.redbullsalzburg.android.AppMode.Default.Splash.SplashActivity" Arbitrary URL Loading June 2, 2023Posted by Julien Ahrens (RCE Security) on Jun 02RCE Security Advisory https://www.rcesecurity.com 1. ADVISORY INFORMATION ======================= Product: FC Red Bull Salzburg App Vendor URL: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=laola.redbull Type: Improper Authorization in Handler for Custom URL Scheme [CWE-939] Date found: 2023-04-06 Date published: 2023-06-01 CVSSv3 Score: 6.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) CVE: CVE-2023-29459...
- [RT-SA-2022-004] STARFACE: Authentication with Password Hash Possible June 1, 2023Posted by RedTeam Pentesting GmbH on Jun 01Advisory: STARFACE: Authentication with Password Hash Possible RedTeam Pentesting discovered that the web interface of STARFACE as well as its REST API allows authentication using the SHA512 hash of the password instead of the cleartext password. While storing password hashes instead of cleartext passwords in an application's database […]
- CVE-2022-48336 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (PRDiagParseAndStoreData @ 0x5cc8) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48336 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (PRDiagParseAndStoreData @ 0x5cc8) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- CVE-2022-48335 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (PRDiagVerifyProvisioning @ 0x5f90) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48335 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (PRDiagVerifyProvisioning @ 0x5f90) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- CVE-2022-48334 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_verify_keys @ 0x7370) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48334 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_verify_keys @ 0x7370) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- CVE-2022-48333 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_verify_keys @ 0x730c) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48333 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_verify_keys @ 0x730c) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- CVE-2022-48332 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_save_keys @ 0x6a18) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48332 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_save_keys @ 0x6a18) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- CVE-2022-48331 - Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_save_keys @ 0x69b0) May 30, 2023Posted by Cyber Intel Security on May 301. INFORMATION -------------- [+] CVE : CVE-2022-48331 [+] Title : Buffer Overflow in Widevine Trustlet (drm_save_keys @ 0x69b0) [+] Vendor : Google [+] Device : Nexus 6 [+] Affected component : Widevine [+] Publication date : March 2023 [+] Credits : CyberIntel Team 2. AFFECTED VERSIONS -------------------- 5.0.0 […]
- SCHUTZWERK-SA-2022-001: Cross-Site-Scripting in Papaya Medical Viewer May 30, 2023Posted by Lennert Preuth via Fulldisclosure on May 30Title ===== SCHUTZWERK-SA-2022-001: Cross-Site-Scripting in Papaya Medical Viewer Status ====== PUBLISHED Version ======= 1.0 CVE reference ============= CVE-2023-33255 Link ==== https://www.schutzwerk.com/advisories/SCHUTZWERK-SA-2022-001/ Text-only version: https://www.schutzwerk.com/advisories/SCHUTZWERK-SA-2022-001.txt Further SCHUTZWERK advisories: https://www.schutzwerk.com/blog/tags/advisories/ Affected products/vendor...
- [RT-SA-2023-005] Pydio Cells: Server-Side Request Forgery May 30, 2023Posted by RedTeam Pentesting GmbH on May 30For longer running processes, Pydio Cells allows for the creation of jobs, which are run in the background. The job "remote-download" can be used to cause the backend to send a HTTP GET request to a specified URL and save the response to a new file. The response […]
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes L'impatto crescente delle minacce informatiche, su sistemi operativi privati op… https://t.co/FimxTS4o9G
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The growing impact of cyber threats, on private or corporate operating systems… https://t.co/y6G6RYA9n1
Tempo di lettura stimato: 6 minuti Today we are talking about the CTI update of our services. Data security is… https://t.co/YAZkn7iFqa
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes Il tema della sicurezza delle informazioni è di grande attualità in questo peri… https://t.co/tfve5Kzr09
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The issue of information security is very topical in this historical period ch… https://t.co/TP8gvdRcrF
Copyright © 2011 Secure Online Desktop s.r.l. All Rights Reserved.