server cloud Piergiorgio Venuti

Server Cloud

server cloud

A cloud server or VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Server Cloud – Pros cons

Pros:

 

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Server Cloud – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Server Cloud – False myths:

  1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
  2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

Check out the Cloud Server

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

Alternative to the NAS

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Demo Cloud Servers

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

New templates for VPS

VPS

Docs

How to have your computer network under control

VPS Metered – Cloud location

ownCloud

Home

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Dark Reading:

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Backdoor.Win32.Hupigon.adef / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/c8f55ce7bbec784a97d7bfc6d7b1931f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Hupigon.adef Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: Backdoor Hupigon (Cracked by bartchen) bartchen () vip sina com, listens on TCP ports 8001,8002,8003,8004 and 8005. Sending a large contaminated HTTP POST request...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Xel / Remote Authentication Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/3648c68bfe395fb9980ae547d881572c.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Xel Vulnerability: Remote Authentication Buffer Overflow Description: Xel listens on TCP port 8023 and requires authentication good for them!, upon connecting you are greeted with a password prompt: XeL TROJAN based […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Verify.f / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/119cd00c48678d63ec07762a7ff08ac7.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Verify.f Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: Backdoor.Win32.Verify by pMK, yet another self-hating backdoor as it lacks authentication granting access to whoever can reach the infected system. This malware listens on...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Onalf / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/ba815d409cd714c0eac010b5970f6408.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Onalf Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: WinRemoteShell (Onalf) listens for commands on TCP port 2020. Interestingly, it will only start listening once it can connect outbound to SMTP port 25. Not much […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.WinShell.30 / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/56a2b135c8d35561ea5b04694155eb77.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.WinShell.30 Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow / Missing Authentication Description: WinShell.30 listens on TCP port 5277 for commands. Attackers or responders who can reach the infected host can trigger a buffer […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Zxman / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6b2a9304d1c7a63365db0f9fd12d39b0.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Zxman Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: Backdoor.Win32.Zxman by Zx-man listens on TCP port 2048 for commands. However, anyone who can reach the infected host can take control as there is no authentication […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Whisper.b / Remote Stack Corruption January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/a0edb91f62c8c083ec35b32a922168d1.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Whisper.b Vulnerability: Remote Stack Corruption Description: Whisper.b listens on TCP port 113 and connects to port 6667, deletes itself drops executable named rundll32.exe in Windows\System dir. The malware is prone to […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Whirlpool.10 / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/bf0682b674ef23cf8ba0deeaf546f422.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Whirlpool.10 Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: Whirlpool listens on UDP Datagram ports 8848 and 8864. Sending a 192 byte payload to port 8864 triggers a stack buffer overflow overwriting both […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.geq / Remote Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021
    Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/fd14cc7f025f49a3e08b4169d44a774e.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.geq Vulnerability: Remote Buffer Overflow Description: Zombam.geq listens for connections on TCP port 80 and trys connect to SMTP port 25. By sending a HTTP GET request of about 2000 bytes […]
  • [REVIVE-SA-2021-001] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities January 22, 2021
    Posted by Matteo Beccati via Fulldisclosure on Jan 22======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2021-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2021-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVE-IDs: CVE-2021-22871, CVE-2021-22872, CVE-2021-22873 Date:...

Customers

Newsletter