Computer network security: PT vs. VA
The security of computer networks is of vital importance for a company. With technologies increasingly relying on remote services, it is good to ensure that security is guaranteed. To do this, two tools are used: Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Test. But what is the difference between them? The answer to this question is not as obvious as one might think.
The short answer is: a Pentest (PT) may be a form of vulnerability assessment (VA), but a vulnerability assessment is definitely not a Pentest. Let’s try to better understand how they work and their purposes.
Verification of the security of computer networks: Vulnerability Assessment
A vulnerability assessment is the process of running automated tools against defined IP addresses to identify vulnerabilities in the environment in which one operates. Vulnerabilities typically include unprotected or misconfigured systems. The tools used to perform vulnerability scans are specific software that automates the process. Obviously these software are practically useless without an operator who knows how to use them correctly.
These tools provide an easy way to scan for vulnerabilities and there are both open source and proprietary ones. The main advantage of the open-source ones is that, with great probability, they are the same ones used by hackers, they are unlikely to pay an expensive subscription, when they can download open source applications for free.
In practice, a VA allows you to:
identify and classify security holes in the computer network
understand the cyber threats to which the company is exposed
recommend corrective measures to eliminate the weaknesses found
The purpose of a Vulnerability Assessment is to identify known vulnerabilities so that they can be corrected. Scans are typically done at least quarterly, although many experts recommend monthly scans.
How to perform a VA
Il processo di esecuzione si divide in due fasi e non prevede lo sfruttamento delle debolezze riscontrate. Questo ulteriore passaggio e’ invece previsto nel Penetration Test.
- Fase 1: prima analisi
- durante questa fase vengono raccolte tutte le informazioni disponibili sull’obiettivo per determinare quali potrebbero essere i punti deboli e le falle nel sistema di sicurezza delle reti informatiche
- Fase 2: seconda analisi
- in questa fase, tramite l’uso delle informazioni ricavate, vengono messe alla prova i possibili problemi. In questa fase le vulnerabilita’ sono testate per capire se siano effettivi problemi come supposto precedentemente.
Data l’incredibile velocita’ in cui le tecnologie e le tecniche informatiche si evolvono, e’ possibile che un sistema si mostri sicuro questo mese, ma abbia invece delle criticita’ da risolvere il mese successivo. Per questo e’ consigliato ripetere regolarmente e con frequenza i controlli di sicurezza sulle reti informatiche aziendali.
The execution process is divided into two phases and does not involve exploiting the weaknesses found. This further step is instead foreseen in the Penetration Test.
Phase 1: first analysis
during this phase, all the information available on the objective is collected to determine what could be the weak points and gaps in the security system of computer networks
Phase 2: second analysis
in this phase, through the use of the information obtained, possible problems are put to the test. In this phase the vulnerabilities are tested to understand if they are actual problems as previously assumed.
Given the incredible speed at which computer technologies and techniques evolve, it is possible that a system will prove secure this month, but instead have some problems to solve the following month. For this reason, it is advisable to repeat the security checks on company computer networks regularly and frequently.
At the end of the process of verifying the vulnerabilities of a system, the final reports contain all the results collected. Typically these enclose all relevant information, including:
the list of vulnerabilities found
an in-depth description of the vulnerabilities
countermeasures to be adopted to reduce risks
Verification of vulnerabilities is a fundamental procedure for the company, but it does not guarantee the security of computer networks. For the correct maintenance of the security of your systems, it is also essential to use another tool: the Penetration Test.
The Pentest, or penetration test, is aimed at verifying how the vulnerabilities of a system can be exploited to gain access and move within it. One of the initial steps performed by a pentester is scanning the network to find IP addresses, device type, operating systems and possible system vulnerabilities. But unlike the Vulnerability Assessment, the Pentest doesn’t stop there.
Of crucial importance for a tester is the exploit of identified vulnerabilities in order to gain control of the network or to take possession of sensitive data. The tester uses configurable automated tools to perform exploits against computer network systems. The peculiar part, however, occurs when the tester performs manual exploit attempts, just like a hacker would.
Penetration tests are classified in two ways: gray box or black box.
Gray box tests are performed with full knowledge of the target company’s IT department. Information is shared with the tester, such as network diagrams, IP addresses, and system configurations. The approach of this method is the verification of the safety of the present technology.
A black box test, on the other hand, represents more properly the action of a hacker who tries to gain unauthorized access to a system. The IT department knows nothing about the test being performed and the tester is not provided with information about the target environment. The black box method evaluates both the underlying technology and the people and processes involved to identify and block an attack as it would happen in the real world.
Phases of the Pentest
Phase 1: Analysis
The system is analyzed, studying its strengths and weaknesses. All preliminary information is collected. This, of course, does not happen if it is a gray box pentest.
Phase 2: Scan
The entire infrastructure is scanned to find the weak points to focus on.
Phase 3: Planning
Thanks to the information gathered, we plan with which tools and techniques to use to hit the system. The possibilities are many and they are both purely technological and social engineering techniques.
Phase 4: actual attack
In this phase the testers try to exploit the identified vulnerabilities to gain full control of the targeted system.
At the end of the Penetration Test, a report is also compiled that details the entire process carried out and includes:
evaluation of the impact of a real attack on the company
solutions to solve problems and secure computer network systems
A Penetration Test that is not successful is a sign that the system under examination is safe * and the data inside it does not risk anything. However, this does not mean that the company will be protected forever from any attack: precisely because the strategies of hackers constantly evolve, it is important to carry out Penetration Tests regularly.
(*) It should be noted, however, that although a good Penetration Test follows guidelines or structuring methodologies (i.e. OWASP) it remains a test with a strong subjective impact of the Penetration Tester and of the team that performed it, therefore it cannot be excluded that by repeating the tests carried out by a different group of Penetration Tester we have no new results. Furthermore, as is well known to our readers, in the field of Cyber Security the concept of “safe” in absolute terms is inadequate.
How to do
Although Vulnerability Assessments and Penetration Tests have different objectives, both should be performed regularly to verify the overall security of the information system.
Vulnerability assessment should be done often to identify and fix known vulnerabilities. The Pentest should be carried out at least once a year and certainly after significant changes in the IT environment, to identify possible exploitable vulnerabilities that may allow unauthorized access to the system. Both of the services described in this article are available through SOD, even on a recursive basis to ensure test effectiveness. contact us to find out more.
- Zero-Day attack: what they are and how to defend yourself with SOCaaS
- Monitoring system, an overview
- Data Exfiltration: defense against data theft
- Install a Let’s Encrypt certificate on Debian based machine
- WastedLocker: Next generation ransomware
- Protecting a site in WordPress: security package
- Critical ransomware: examples of successful attacks
- Secure Online Desktop Social Initiatives
- Backup as a Service (2)
- Cloud Conference (3)
- Cloud CRM (1)
- Cloud Server/VPS (20)
- Conferenza Cloud (4)
- ICT Monitoring (4)
- Log Management (2)
- News (16)
- ownCloud (4)
- Privacy (6)
- Secure Online Desktop (14)
- Security (6)
- Web Hosting (12)
- Intel Confirms Unauthorized Access of Earnings-Related Data January 22, 2021News likely contributed to slide of over 9% in chipmaker's stock at one point Friday.
- Speed of Digital Transformation May Lead to Greater App Vulnerabilities January 22, 2021The fastest-moving industries are struggling to produce secure code, according to AppSec experts.
- How Cybersecurity Newbs Can Start Out on the Right Foot January 22, 2021Cybersecurity experts share their savvy tips and useful resources for infosec hopefuls.
- Why North Korea Excels in Cybercrime January 22, 2021North Korea is laser-focused on boosting its cyber capabilities, and it's doing a remarkable job of it.
- DreamBus, FreakOut Botnets Pose New Threat to Linux Systems January 21, 2021Researchers from Zscaler and Check Point describe botnets as designed for DDoS attacks, cryptocurrency mining, and other malicious purposes.
- Breach Data Shows Attackers Switched Gears in 2020 January 21, 2021Attackers focused more on ransomware, while the consolidation of data into large databases led to fewer reported breaches but more records leaked.
- Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google January 21, 2021Operators behind a global phishing campaign inadvertently left thousands of stolen credentials accessible via Google Search.
- Cloud Jacking: The Bold New World of Enterprise Cybersecurity January 21, 2021Increased reliance on cloud computing puts more weight on robust authentication systems to protect data against hijackers.
- 7 Steps to Secure a WordPress Site January 21, 2021Many companies operate under the assumption that their WordPress sites are secure -- and that couldn't be anything further from the truth.
- Hacker Pig Latin: A Base64 Primer for Security Analysts January 21, 2021The Base64 encoding scheme is often used to hide the plaintext elements in the early stages of an attack that can't be concealed under the veil of encryption. Here's how to see through its tricks.
- Backdoor.Win32.Hupigon.adef / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/c8f55ce7bbec784a97d7bfc6d7b1931f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Hupigon.adef Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: Backdoor Hupigon (Cracked by bartchen) bartchen () vip sina com, listens on TCP ports 8001,8002,8003,8004 and 8005. Sending a large contaminated HTTP POST request...
- Backdoor.Win32.Xel / Remote Authentication Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/3648c68bfe395fb9980ae547d881572c.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Xel Vulnerability: Remote Authentication Buffer Overflow Description: Xel listens on TCP port 8023 and requires authentication good for them!, upon connecting you are greeted with a password prompt: XeL TROJAN based […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Verify.f / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/119cd00c48678d63ec07762a7ff08ac7.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Verify.f Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: Backdoor.Win32.Verify by pMK, yet another self-hating backdoor as it lacks authentication granting access to whoever can reach the infected system. This malware listens on...
- Backdoor.Win32.Onalf / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/ba815d409cd714c0eac010b5970f6408.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Onalf Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: WinRemoteShell (Onalf) listens for commands on TCP port 2020. Interestingly, it will only start listening once it can connect outbound to SMTP port 25. Not much […]
- Backdoor.Win32.WinShell.30 / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/56a2b135c8d35561ea5b04694155eb77.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.WinShell.30 Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow / Missing Authentication Description: WinShell.30 listens on TCP port 5277 for commands. Attackers or responders who can reach the infected host can trigger a buffer […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Zxman / Missing Authentication January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6b2a9304d1c7a63365db0f9fd12d39b0.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Zxman Vulnerability: Missing Authentication Description: Backdoor.Win32.Zxman by Zx-man listens on TCP port 2048 for commands. However, anyone who can reach the infected host can take control as there is no authentication […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Whisper.b / Remote Stack Corruption January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/a0edb91f62c8c083ec35b32a922168d1.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Whisper.b Vulnerability: Remote Stack Corruption Description: Whisper.b listens on TCP port 113 and connects to port 6667, deletes itself drops executable named rundll32.exe in Windows\System dir. The malware is prone to […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Whirlpool.10 / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/bf0682b674ef23cf8ba0deeaf546f422.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Whirlpool.10 Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow Description: Whirlpool listens on UDP Datagram ports 8848 and 8864. Sending a 192 byte payload to port 8864 triggers a stack buffer overflow overwriting both […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.geq / Remote Buffer Overflow January 22, 2021Posted by malvuln on Jan 22Discovery / credits: Malvuln - malvuln.com (c) 2021 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/fd14cc7f025f49a3e08b4169d44a774e.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Zombam.geq Vulnerability: Remote Buffer Overflow Description: Zombam.geq listens for connections on TCP port 80 and trys connect to SMTP port 25. By sending a HTTP GET request of about 2000 bytes […]
- [REVIVE-SA-2021-001] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities January 22, 2021Posted by Matteo Beccati via Fulldisclosure on Jan 22======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2021-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2021-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVE-IDs: CVE-2021-22871, CVE-2021-22872, CVE-2021-22873 Date:...
Ransomware commonly comes up with an email that tricks users into trusting a malicious file. Many of the most recen… https://t.co/wIarD0ojXT
Tempo di lettura: 5 minSul web sono disponibili moltissime applicazioni open source che permettono di gestire le pi… https://t.co/SjCg383iEF
On the web there are many open source applications that allow you to manage the most various situations. It is comm… https://t.co/e5OZvRPAqm
Tempo di lettura: 4 minLa pratica dello shadow IT e' l'utilizzo di sistemi informatici, dispositivi, software, appl… https://t.co/9wQPtvqemG
The practice of shadow IT is the use of computer systems, devices, software, applications and services without the… https://t.co/CgzjblglX9