Audit IT Piergiorgio Venuti

Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Introduction

Cybersecurity has become a major concern for modern businesses. With the increase in cyber attacks, data breaches and privacy threats, organizations must take proactive measures to protect their systems and data. Two key components of any cybersecurity program are IT audit and log management. But what is the difference between these two aspects? And why are both necessary?

What is an IT audit?

An IT audit is a process of checking security controls, configurations and vulnerabilities within an organization’s IT infrastructure and systems. Audits are conducted on a periodic basis by internal or external auditors to identify risks, weaknesses and areas for improvement.

Common elements of an IT audit include:

  • Check network and security configurations
  • Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing
  • Review of access controls and policies
  • Evaluation of update and patch management
  • Inspection of incident management and response plans

Audits provide a periodic snapshot of the security posture and help ensure regulatory compliance. However, they do not provide continuous monitoring and visibility.

What is log management?

Log Management

Log management refers to the centralized collection, storage and analysis of logs generated by IT systems, applications and network devices. Logs record user and system activity and are a vital source of security data and information.

The main capabilities of a log management solution include:

  • Collection and centralization of logs from heterogeneous sources
  • Secure long-term log storage
  • Real-time correlation of suspicious events and activities
  • Dashboards and reporting for visibility and monitoring
  • Configurable alarms and warnings
  • Log analysis for investigations and forensics

Log management provides continuous monitoring and visibility into threats and anomalous activities. However, it does not perform proactive checks of security controls.

Key differences

While audit and log management are both critical to an effective security program, there are some key differences:

Frequency – Audits are periodic. Log management is continuous and in real time.

Approach – Audits are proactive, timely checks. Log management is passive and reactive.

Perspective – Audits provide a cross-sectional snapshot. Logs provide a longitudinal view over time.

Coverage – Audits are limited in time and scope. Log management monitors the entire environment.

Output – Audits produce static reports. Logs enable dynamic analysis.

Costs – Audits require ongoing human resources. Log management automates with lower costs.

Benefits of a managed service

For both IT audit and log management, organizations can choose to implement an in-house solution or rely on managed service providers. Managed services offer several benefits:

  • Experience – Specialized suppliers with in-depth expertise and established best practices.
  • Resources – Access to advanced technologies and dedicated teams of professionals.
  • Scalability – Elastic capabilities to meet changing needs.
  • Efficiencies – Automation and optimization of processes for greater productivity.
  • Compliance – Support meeting compliance standards and frameworks.
  • Costs – Converting fixed costs into flexible operating expenses.
  • Focus – Freeing up time and resources to focus on your core business.

Whether you choose audit or log management, managed services eliminate complexity and allow you to delegate these critical capabilities to trusted partners.

Considerations for choosing a managed service

When selecting a managed service provider, organizations should consider:

  • Coverage – Breadth and depth of functionality and visibility provided.
  • Skills – Level of experience with relevant technologies and standards.
  • Size – Scale and capacity to handle growing volumes and needs.
  • Security – Rigorous controls to protect data confidentiality.
  • Flexibility – Customization to fit specific needs.
  • Reporting – Clear dashboards and reports for relevant metrics and insights.
  • Support – Availability of expert staff for assistance and advice.
  • Pricing – Transparent and predictable pricing models.
  • Integrations – Ability to incorporate with existing tools.

By choosing carefully, organizations can obtain comprehensive and effective audit and log management services on an ongoing basis.

Internal management vs outsourcing

Organizations must decide whether to manage these capabilities internally or outsource:

Internal management

  • Greater control and customization
  • Internal network of dedicated staff
  • Maintenance of internal skills

Outsourcing

  • Instant access to skills and experience
  • No hiring or training requirements
  • Transfer of complexity and responsibility
  • Cost reduction through economies of scale

Outsourcing is often more beneficial for SMEs, while large enterprises can gain value from a hybrid approach.

IT audit and log management play complementary but distinct roles in a cybersecurity program. Audits provide proactive cross-sectional assessments of security posture, while log management enables ongoing monitoring and analysis. Fully managed services offer specialized expertise, streamlined operations, and elastic capabilities for both audits and log management. By choosing a reliable provider, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity without complexity or excessive expense.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • BACKDOOR.WIN32.DUMADOR.C / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) April 19, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Apr 19Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6cc630843cabf23621375830df474bc5.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Dumador.c Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware runs an FTP server on TCP port 10000. Third-party adversaries who can reach the server can send a specially […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20240418-0 :: Broken authorization in Dreamehome app April 19, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 19SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240418-0 > ======================================================================= title: Broken authorization product: Dreamehome app vulnerable version:
  • MindManager 23 - full disclosure April 19, 2024
    Posted by Pawel Karwowski via Fulldisclosure on Apr 19Resending! Thank you for your efforts. GitHub - pawlokk/mindmanager-poc: public disclosure Affected application: MindManager23_setup.exe Platform: Windows Issue: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI installer Repair Mode (EXE hijacking race condition) Discovered and reported by: Pawel Karwowski and Julian Horoszkiewicz (Eviden Red Team) Proposed mitigation:...
  • CVE-2024-31705 April 14, 2024
    Posted by V3locidad on Apr 14CVE ID: CVE-2024-31705 Title : RCE to Shell Commands" Plugin / GLPI Shell Command Management Interface Affected Product : GLPI - 10.X.X and last version Description: An issue in Infotel Conseil GLPI v.10.X.X and after allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the insufficient validation of user-supplied input. […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20240411-0 :: Database Passwords in Server Response in Amazon AWS Glue April 14, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 14SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240411-0 > ======================================================================= title: Database Passwords in Server Response product: Amazon AWS Glue vulnerable version: until 2024-02-23 fixed version: as of 2024-02-23 CVE number: - impact: medium homepage: https://aws.amazon.com/glue/ found:...
  • [KIS-2024-03] Invision Community <= 4.7.16 (toolbar.php) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability April 11, 2024
    Posted by Egidio Romano on Apr 10------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invision Community
  • [KIS-2024-02] Invision Community <= 4.7.15 (store.php) SQL Injection Vulnerability April 11, 2024
    Posted by Egidio Romano on Apr 10-------------------------------------------------------------------- Invision Community
  • Multiple Issues in concretecmsv9.2.7 April 11, 2024
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Apr 10# Exploit Title: Multiple Web Flaws in concretecmsv9.2.7 # Date: 4/2024 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 9.2.7 # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: http://msecureltd.blogspot.com Verbose Error Message - Stack Trace: 1. Directly browse to edit profile page 2. Error should come up with verbose stack trace […]
  • OXAS-ADV-2024-0001: OX App Suite Security Advisory April 11, 2024
    Posted by Martin Heiland via Fulldisclosure on Apr 10Dear subscribers, We&apos;re sharing our latest advisory with you and like to thank everyone who contributed in finding and solving those vulnerabilities. Feel free to join our bug bounty programs for OX App Suite, Dovecot and PowerDNS at YesWeHack. This advisory has also been published at https://documentation.open-xchange.com/appsuite/security/advisories/html/2024/oxas-adv-2024-0001.html. […]
  • Trojan.Win32.Razy.abc / Insecure Permissions (In memory IPC) April 11, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Apr 10Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/0eb4a9089d3f7cf431d6547db3b9484d.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Trojan.Win32.Razy.abc Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions (In memory IPC) Family: Razy Type: PE32 MD5: 0eb4a9089d3f7cf431d6547db3b9484d SHA256: 3d82fee314e7febb8307ccf8a7396b6dd53c7d979a74aa56f3c4a6d0702fd098 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0678...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}