Ransomware a doppia estorsione Cover Giacomo Lanzi

Double extortion ransomware: What they are and how to defend yourself

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

Looking to up the ante and earn more money with the ransomware , i Cybercriminals are increasingly using a tactic known as double extortion ransomware . Not only do they encrypt data and demand a ransom from the victim to regain access. They also threaten to upload them online if their conditions are not met.

Let’s take a step back, ransomware is one of the most common types of malware. It targets a company every 14 seconds and it cost $ 11.5 billion in 2019 alone . Typically, hackers who carry out these attacks break into a system to steal data and delete it if the victim doesn’t pay a ransom.

Double extortion ransomware

Why do hackers prefer double-extortion ransomware?

The rise of double extortion ransomware proves that cybercriminals are constantly expanding their arsenal. Paolo Passeri, director of cyber intelligence at the software firm Netskope , says these attacks they have become popular because they are the easiest way for hackers to make money.

Passeri Says: “With double extortion ransomware attacks, even if a backup is available, attackers can put more pressure on the victim to pay the ransom . The increased pressure comes from the potentially serious consequences of a data leak, for example economic and reputational damage. Groups like REvil are even more creative: they don’t just leak data, they monetize it by auctioning it on the dark web and putting even more pressure on their victims. “

When conducting a double extortion ransomware attack, hackers start spending more time on the overall strategy . Sparrows warns that scammers are no longer taking an opportunistic approach. Instead, they are carefully selecting their target and method of attack to increase the ransom money they make . He explains: “ the threat actors select their victims, choosing organizations whose businesses could be affected by a data leak “.

The spear phishing is the primary means of distributing double extortion ransomware, but cybercriminals are also by exploiting vulnerabilities in on-premises devices such as VPN concentrators. “In the past few months, nearly all major VPN technologies have suffered severe vulnerabilities that have been exploited for similar attacks,” says Passeri.

“This is unfortunate given the current situation with forced telework where these remote access technologies play a crucial role in ensuring business continuity during Covid-19. These systems are directly exposed to the Internet, so threat actors can scan them and then exploit any vulnerabilities discovered “.

Risks of Doxing : diffusion of private data

Double extortion ransomware provides more opportunities for cybercriminals, allowing them to extort victims twice. They can ask for a first payment to decrypt the files and a second payment not to make them public.

This technique, also known as doxing , is been used by an increasing number of ransomware groups over the past year. The consequences of doxing are more severe for the victim, so they often come down to demands. This means more money in the pockets of cybercriminals to fund new strains of ransomware and support other criminal activities.

Improvements in malware and financial incentives for hackers have led to the growth of double extortion ransomware attacks. In the past, ransomware encrypted files and hackers stole data, but it was rare to do both.

We now have bots that can scan the web for unprotected data, steal it, encrypt it or delete it, and leave a ransom note for the owner, all in one automated attack. The hacker can then collect a ransom for the data and sell the data to other criminals, playing double-crosses with minimal effort .

Doxing Double Extortion Ransomware

An aggressive-tactic

There has been an influx of double extortion ransomware attacks in the past year. Hackers gained traction in late 2019 when high-profile groups like Maze began exploiting aggressively this tactic.

In these particularly aggressive cases, the hacker would extract a copy of the data before encrypting it . This way the attacker not only prevents the victim from accessing her data, but also keeps a copy of the data for himself.

To claim responsibility and put pressure on the victim during the negotiation process, the attacker often released small chunks of data online. If the deals are blocked or failed, the attacker publishes all the stolen data or sells it to third parties . This creates a significant violation against the victim.

What to do

To defend against these attacks, there are several steps companies should take . For example, keeping systems updated to ensure that known vulnerabilities are resolved. It is also imperative that organizations have a layered security approach that includes the use of data loss prevention tools . An example is the service offered by SOD Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud . The system can stop the extraction or encryption of the data which initiates these double extortion attacks.

But what can organizations do if they can’t successfully mitigate one of these attacks?

Organizations should try to include a last line of defense that isolates and stops illegitimate encryption immediately . This mitigates the risk when traditional prevention-based security has been compromised or bypassed. Robust backup processes, including air-gap backups, should also be considered to make it more difficult for criminals to encrypt or disable critical data stores.

Consequences

If an organization falls victim to a double extortion ransomware attack, there are often dire consequences. Criminal groups are increasingly blatant, even dystopian names like Maze, Netwalker and REvil, are an indication of this inclination. Their pride leads them to display exfiltrated data as online trophies and even sponsor clandestine hacking contests to display their malware. In a kind of cyber show-off . < / p>

For the victims, the consequences can be devastating. Travelex, a currency exchange service, went into receivership with the loss of 1,300 jobs in the UK following a ransomware attack . During the heist, the cyber gang REvil asked the company to pay $ 6 million in 48 hours. The company has faced the threat of publishing credit card information, national insurance numbers and birth dates of its customers.

It is clearly critical that companies do everything they can to identify and stop these attacks before they cause more damage. Preventing these attacks proactively is much better than mitigating their effects, with all the financial costs and reputational damage they entail .

Most attackers gain access through human error . For this, together with technical measures such as internal data access management and back-up, staff training and supervision are key elements in an organization’s defenses .

Victims essentially have two choices, both of which are costly: if they refuse to pay, they face a catastrophic data breach with exposure to painful regulatory fines and civil demands; if they pay the ransom, they still have no guarantee that the data will be returned.

Double Extortion Ransomware Consequences

Handle double-extortion ransomware

While getting hit by ransomware can deal a severe blow to any business, companies should be cautious when asked to pay a ransom. Doing so could involve even greater risks . There is no certainty that these hackers will not ask for more money without releasing the data anyway.

It is important for companies to secure their networks and conduct mock test < / a> to mitigate the ransomware threat . Such simulated attacks will help spot vulnerabilities within the organization without the risk of facing serious financial problems and having to answer very difficult questions from customers.

Implementing strong resilience measures is the best way to prevent double extortion ransomware. Ransomware is often a secondary infection. Threat actors seek to exploit known vulnerabilities, particularly in relation to remote access protocols and applications that are critical for working from home.

Critical to mitigating this is ensuring that vulnerabilities are patched in a timely manner and that network data logs are monitored for any unusual activity or data exfiltration. < / strong> There is therefore a potential window of opportunity to remedy any primary infection (which precedes the ransomware) and thus prevent the ransom note process from developing.

Education

Organizations need to educate staff about the risks of double extortion ransomware and how it is executed . Individual users can also be of great help by being aware of the potential of unsafe attachments. They should also be cautious about clicking any email links received in any communication , particularly with the recent resurgence of Emotet , a known malware.

There are two defense strategies for dealing with double extortion ransomware. First, robust backups, to make sure you don’t your hands tied if hackers gain control of your data. Then, encryption, to make sure that if an attacker threatens to expose your data, it’s protected too.

These approaches should then be incorporated into a broader strategy: careful monitoring of the network that could allow attackers to be cut off, and promoting employee IT education not to fall victim to phishing attacks which are often the main cause of a ransomware incident.

The threat of double extortion ransomware is undeniable, with cybercriminals carefully targeting and creating these attacks in an attempt to increase the size of ransom.

Organizations often feel they have no choice but to pay the ransom to avoid the leak of sensitive data. But it’s actually a Russian roulette game and the stolen information can still find its way online. Therefore the focus must be on prevention and risk mitigation .

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Dark Reading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Backdoor.Win32.InfecDoor.17.c / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1fd70e41918c3a75c634b1c234ec36fb.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.InfecDoor.17.c Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes a ".420" settings file type to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can...
  • Trojan-Mailfinder.Win32.VB.p / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/20e438d84aa2828826d52540d80bf7f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Trojan-Mailfinder.Win32.VB.p Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes a dir with multiple PE files to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Shark.btu / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/5a83f8b8c8a8b7a85b3ff632aa60e793.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Shark.btu Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes multiple PE files to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can rename the executable...
  • Yashma Ransomware Builder v1.2 / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/13e878ed7e547523cffc5728f6ba4190.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Yashma Ransomware Builder v1.2 Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware creates PE files with insecure permissions when writing to c:\ drive, granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user […]
  • AnyDesk Public Exploit Disclosure - Arbitrary file write by symbolic link attack lead to denial-of-service attack on local machine June 28, 2022
    Posted by chan chan on Jun 27Hi FullDisclosure, I would like to publish an exploit that I found on AnyDesk as follows. # Exploit Title: AnyDesk allow arbitrary file write by symbolic link attack lead to denial-of-service attack on local machine # Google Dork: [if applicable] # Date: 24/5/2022 # Exploit Author: Erwin Chan # […]
  • SEC-T CFP ongoing June 28, 2022
    Posted by Mattias Bååth via Fulldisclosure on Jun 27Hey all It&apos;s now less than two weeks to submit a talk to SEC-T 2022, at least if you want to be part of the first talk selection round (recommended) that we kick off July first. SEC-T is non-profit, non-corporate, two day, single track, con in Stockholm, […]
  • CFP No cON Name 2022 - Barcelona June 28, 2022
    Posted by Jose Nicolas Castellano via Fulldisclosure on Jun 27No cON Name 2022 - Barcelona ************************************ *****  Call For Papers        ****** ************************************ https://www.noconname.org/call-for-papers/ Exact place not disclosed until a few weeks before due celebration.     * INTRODUCTION The organization has  opened CFP proposals. No cON Name is the eldest Hacking and Security Conference in Span. […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0007: Directory Traversal vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0007: Directory Traversal vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) ## Impact on Business Exposing the contents of a directory can lead to a disclosure of useful information for the attacker to devise exploits, such as creation times of files or […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0006: Information Disclosure vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0006: Information Disclosure vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) ## Impact on Business Running unnecessary services, like a jetty webserver, may lead to increased surface area for an attack and also it unnecessarily exposes underlying vulnerabilities. ## Advisory Information - […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0005: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Fiori launchpad June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0005: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Fiori launchpad ## Impact on Business Impact depends on the victim&apos;s privileges. In most cases, a successful attack allows an attacker to hijack a session, or force the victim to perform undesired requests in the SAP […]

Customers

Newsletter