pass the ticket laptop Giacomo Lanzi

Pass the Ticket: how to mitigate it with a SOCaaS

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Every year the number of attacks that threaten the security of devices, computer systems, servers and network infrastructures is growing steadily. This is done by taking advantage of the vulnerabilities present in these systems. Among the many types of attacks, particular attention must be paid to the pass the ticket (PTT) attack.

With a pass the ticket attack it is possible to take advantage of the Kerberos network protocol, present in all major operating systems, to access a user’s session without having his login credentials. An attack of this type can be difficult to detect and is usually able to bypass the most common system access controls.

pass the ticket laptop

Pass The Ticket: what it is and how it works

Kerberos

Before understanding in detail what a PTT attack is and how it works, it is advisable to clarify the Kerberos network protocol since an attack of this type uses this protocol. Kerberos is a network protocol designed by MIT in the 1980s and became a standard IETF in 1993. It is used for strong authentication between different terminals through a symmetric key encryption system, without transmitting any passwords.

The advantage of using the Kerberos protocol lies in its strong authentication system between client and server. This makes it very effective against phishing and “ man in the middle ” attacks.
Kerberos is integrated into all major operating systems belonging to well-known companies such as Microsoft, Apple, Red Hat Linux and many more.

With a pass the ticket attack it is possible to exploit Kerberos authentication to gain access to a user account. The consequences that such an event could entail are not are to be underestimated. Among the many imaginable scenarios, for example, there could be the possibility that the compromised account enjoys high administrative privileges thus guaranteeing the hacker full access to resources.

The attack

A pass the ticket attack allows you to gain privileged access to network resources without having to use any user passwords . Here’s how: In Active Directory, a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) serves to prove that a user is just who he says to be. Through some tools and techniques, a hacker could collect these tickets and use them to request Ticket Granting Services (TGS) in order to access resources present in other parts of the network.

A PTT attack could involve risks even if the compromised account does not have particular administrative privileges since the hacker, through the Lateral Movement < / a>, may be able to gain access to other accounts and devices.

The difference between pass the ticket and an attack pass the hash lies in the fact that the former exploits TGT tickets that have an expiration of a few hours, while the latter uses NTLM hashes that change only in case a user decides to change his password. A TGT ticket must be used within its expiration time or renewed for a longer period of time.

How to Defend and Prevent a Pass The Ticket Attack

Keeping a network and the devices connected to it safe is a very important factor. You must always have protocols and software that are able to guarantee effective protection from all kinds of threats , with up-to-date systems that keep sensitive information safe. Enterprises can take advantage of endpoint detection and response technologies. Local detection of multiple tickets used for the same session will be possible.

Account case without-privileges

In the event of a pass the ticket attack, if the compressed account from which the TGT or TGS was stolen was a low-privilege account, the mitigation could be quite simple. Just reset the user’s Active Directory password. Such an action would invalidate the TGT or TGS, preventing the hacker from generating new tickets.

Case-account with privileges

Conversely, if the PTT attack compromised a privileged account, limiting the damage is much more difficult. In these cases, companies could respond to the attack by resetting the Kerberos TGT service to to generate a new signing key, making sure to delete the compromised key.

Next you need to drill down into Kerberos logs and Active Directory information to investigate and find out which network resources have been compromised. In this way it is also possible to understand which data may have been stolen. The technology SIEM allows organizations to assimilate, analyze and analyze this data.

Pass the ticket User privileges

Protection from attack

To ensure complete protection of an infrastructure, also preventing pass the ticket attacks, it is good to use valid detection technologies such as UEBA and SIEM. In fact, it is possible to prevent Pass The Ticket attacks by analyzing the behavior of users and entities. The solution UEBA , in these cases, would ensure the quick identification of any compromised account, blocking it in order to mitigate the damage.

Some software SIEM also allow not only to analyze traditional logs but are also able to provide an accurate analysis of security , analyzing the behavior of the network and users in order to detect promptly the presence of any threats to the infrastructure.

Conclusions

We have seen what a pass the ticket attack is and how companies can adopt specific solutions to intercept the dangers and anomalies of an entire IT infrastructure. This allows us to mitigate threats more effectively.

A complete solution, as we have seen, involves constant and granular communication monitoring . The solution we propose for this purpose is a SOCaaS .

If you want to know our dedicated security services, do not hesitate to contact us. You can use the button below, we will be happy to answer any of your questions.

Link utili:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Dark Reading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 83): instead to fix even their most stupid mistaskes, they spill barrels of snakeoil to cover them (or just leave them as-is) March 17, 2023
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Mar 16Hi @ll, with Windows 2000, Microsoft virtualised the [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT] registry branch: what was just an alias for [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes] before became the overlay of [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes] and [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes] with the latter having precedence: Note: while [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes] is writable only by...
  • [CFP] Security BSides Ljubljana 0x7E7 | June 16, 2023 March 17, 2023
    Posted by Andraz Sraka on Mar 16MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNmddmNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMN..-..--+MMNy:...-.-/yNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMy..ymd-.:Mm::-:osyo-..-mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MM:..---.:dM/..+NNyyMN/..:MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Mm../dds.-oy.-.dMh--mMds++MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM My:::::/ydMmo..-hMMMmo//omMs/+Mm+++++shNMN+//+//+oMNy+///ohM MMMs//yMNo+hMh---m:-:hy+sMN..+Mo..os+.-:Ny--ossssdN-.:yyo+mM...
  • Full Disclosure - Fastly March 12, 2023
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Mar 11Correspondence from Fastly declined to comment regarding new discovered vulnerabilities within their website. Poor practices regarding password changes. 1. Reset user password 2. Access link sent 3. Temporary password sent plaintext // HTTP POST request POST /user/mwebsec%40gmail.com/password/request_reset HTTP/2 Host: api.fastly.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101 […]
  • Full Disclosure - Shopify Application March 12, 2023
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Mar 11Correspondence from Shopify declined to comment regarding new discovered vulnerabilities within their website. Although &apos;frontend&apos; vulnerabilities are considered out of scope, person/tester foundhimself a beefy bugbounty from the same page that has been listed below, including similar functionality that has not been tested yet. Two emails and several reports, […]
  • [CVE-2023-25355/25356] No fix available - vulnerabilities in CoreDial sipXcom sipXopenfire March 7, 2023
    Posted by Systems Research Group via Fulldisclosure on Mar 06
  • SEC Consult SA-20230306-0 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Arris DG3450 Cable Gateway March 7, 2023
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab, Research via Fulldisclosure on Mar 06SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20230306-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Vulnerabilities product: Arris DG3450 Cable Gateway vulnerable version: AR01.02.056.18_041520_711.NCS.10 fixed version: - CVE number: CVE-2023-27571, CVE-2023-27572 impact: medium homepage: https://www.commscope.com...
  • OpenBSD overflow March 7, 2023
    Posted by Erg Noor on Mar 06Hi, Fun OpenBSD bug. ip_dooptions() will allow IPOPT_SSRR with optlen = 2. save_rte() will set isr_nhops to very large value, which will cause overflow in next ip_srcroute() call. More info is here https://github.com/fuzzingrf/openbsd_tcpip_overflow/ -erg
  • SEC Consult SA-20230228-0 :: OS Command Injectionin Barracuda CloudGen WAN March 3, 2023
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab, Research via Fulldisclosure on Mar 02SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20230228-0 > ======================================================================= title: OS Command Injection product: Barracuda CloudGen WAN vulnerable version: < v8.* hotfix 1089 fixed version: v8.* with hotfix webui-sdwan-1089-8.3.1-174141891 or above version 9.0.0 or above CVE number: CVE-2023-26213...
  • SRP on Windows 11 March 3, 2023
    Posted by Andy Ful on Mar 02The correction to: Full Disclosure: Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 82): INVALID/BOGUS AppLocker rules disable SAFER on Windows 11 22H2 (seclists.org) The Kanthak correction to restore SRP functionality on Windows 11 ver. 22H2, works only when Smart App Control is OFF. If it is in Evaluate […]
  • NetBSD overflow March 3, 2023
    Posted by Erg Noor on Mar 02Hi, Trivial overflow in hfslib_reada_node_offset, while loop has no range checks. |size_t hfslib_reada_node_offsets(void* in_bytes, uint16_t* out_offset_array) { void* ptr; if (in_bytes == NULL || out_offset_array == NULL) return 0; ptr = in_bytes; out_offset_array--; do { out_offset_array++; *out_offset_array = be16tohp(&ptr); } while (*out_offset_array != (uint16_t)14); return ((uint8_t*)ptr - (uint8_t*)in_bytes); }| […]

Customers

Newsletter