shadow IT Giacomo Lanzi

Shadow IT: an overview

The practice of shadow IT is the use of computer systems, devices, software, applications and services without the explicit approval of the IT department. In recent years, it has grown exponentially with the adoption of cloud-based applications and services.

While shadow IT could improve employee productivity and drive innovation, it can also introduce serious security risks to the organization due to data breaches, potential compliance breaches and more.

Why users practice shadow IT

One of the main reasons employees apply shadow IT is simply to work more efficiently. A 2012 RSA study reported that 35% of employees believe they need to bypass their company’s security policies just to get their job done right. For example, an employee may discover a better file sharing application than is officially allowed. Once you start using it, the use may spread to other members of your department.

The rapid growth of cloud-based consumer applications has also increased the adoption of shadow IT practices. The days of packaged software are long gone; Common applications such as Slack and Dropbox are available with a simple click, and corporate data is easily copied beyond work applications to employee personal devices, such as smartphones or laptops, especially in BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) working conditions .

Shadow IT: Security Risks and Challenges

The point is that if the IT department is not aware of the use of an application, they cannot support or guarantee that it is secure. Industry analyst firm Gartner predicted, in 2018, that by 2020, one-third of successful attacks businesses experience focus on their shadow IT assets.

While it is clear that the practice will not go away, organizations can minimize risks by educating end users and taking preventative measures to monitor and manage unauthorized applications.

Not all shadow IT is inherently dangerous, but some features like file sharing and storage and collaboration (for example, Google Docs) can cause sensitive data leaks. This risk goes beyond applications alone: the RSA study also reports that 63% of employees send work documents to their personal email to work from home, exposing data to networks that cannot be monitored.

In times like the one we are experiencing, in which teleworking is encouraged and, in some cases, the only possible solution, it is essential to have an eye for the applications in use on employees’ computers.

shadow IT

Benefits of Shadow IT

Despite the risks, shadow IT has its advantages. Getting IT approval can take time that employees can’t afford to waste.For many employees, approval is a productivity bottleneck, especially when they can get a fix in minutes.

Having IT behaving like an Orwellian “Big Brother” doesn’t always help productivity. Discerning cases of positive shadow IT can be the best compromise. Finding a middle ground can allow end users to research solutions that work best for them. This gives IT time to control user data and permissions for applications. If end users do not need to request new solutions, the IT department has been given time to focus on more critical tasks.

Proactive defense

Whatever the reason why shadow IT occurs, if the IT department is unaware of it, the risk of breach is high. What the corporate cyber security departments should do is implement automated traffic and behavior control systems.

The solution offered by a SOC as a Service is the most complete in this respect. It allows you to keep an eye on all the devices in the system and also monitor user behavior.

Thanks to the Nextgen SIEM and UEBA systems, in fact, the collection of usage data is easy and manageable in real time. The data collected is enriched and aggregated to give analysts the most complete view possible and allow rapid intervention. Meanwhile, the UEBA system checks that there are no anomalous behavior by users or suspicious outgoing data traffic.

Shadow IT, while not usually a malicious attack, is a practice that should be discouraged and, as it is risky, stopped in the bud.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Dark Reading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Backdoor.Win32.InfecDoor.17.c / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1fd70e41918c3a75c634b1c234ec36fb.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.InfecDoor.17.c Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes a ".420" settings file type to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can...
  • Trojan-Mailfinder.Win32.VB.p / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/20e438d84aa2828826d52540d80bf7f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Trojan-Mailfinder.Win32.VB.p Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes a dir with multiple PE files to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Shark.btu / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/5a83f8b8c8a8b7a85b3ff632aa60e793.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Shark.btu Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware writes multiple PE files to c drive granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user group. Standard users can rename the executable...
  • Yashma Ransomware Builder v1.2 / Insecure Permissions June 28, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/13e878ed7e547523cffc5728f6ba4190.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Yashma Ransomware Builder v1.2 Vulnerability: Insecure Permissions Description: The malware creates PE files with insecure permissions when writing to c:\ drive, granting change (C) permissions to the authenticated user […]
  • AnyDesk Public Exploit Disclosure - Arbitrary file write by symbolic link attack lead to denial-of-service attack on local machine June 28, 2022
    Posted by chan chan on Jun 27Hi FullDisclosure, I would like to publish an exploit that I found on AnyDesk as follows. # Exploit Title: AnyDesk allow arbitrary file write by symbolic link attack lead to denial-of-service attack on local machine # Google Dork: [if applicable] # Date: 24/5/2022 # Exploit Author: Erwin Chan # […]
  • SEC-T CFP ongoing June 28, 2022
    Posted by Mattias Bååth via Fulldisclosure on Jun 27Hey all It's now less than two weeks to submit a talk to SEC-T 2022, at least if you want to be part of the first talk selection round (recommended) that we kick off July first. SEC-T is non-profit, non-corporate, two day, single track, con in Stockholm, […]
  • CFP No cON Name 2022 - Barcelona June 28, 2022
    Posted by Jose Nicolas Castellano via Fulldisclosure on Jun 27No cON Name 2022 - Barcelona ************************************ *****  Call For Papers        ****** ************************************ https://www.noconname.org/call-for-papers/ Exact place not disclosed until a few weeks before due celebration.     * INTRODUCTION The organization has  opened CFP proposals. No cON Name is the eldest Hacking and Security Conference in Span. […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0007: Directory Traversal vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0007: Directory Traversal vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) ## Impact on Business Exposing the contents of a directory can lead to a disclosure of useful information for the attacker to devise exploits, such as creation times of files or […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0006: Information Disclosure vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0006: Information Disclosure vulnerability in SAP Focused Run (Simple Diagnostics Agent 1.0) ## Impact on Business Running unnecessary services, like a jetty webserver, may lead to increased surface area for an attack and also it unnecessarily exposes underlying vulnerabilities. ## Advisory Information - […]
  • Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0005: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Fiori launchpad June 21, 2022
    Posted by Onapsis Research via Fulldisclosure on Jun 21# Onapsis Security Advisory 2022-0005: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Fiori launchpad ## Impact on Business Impact depends on the victim's privileges. In most cases, a successful attack allows an attacker to hijack a session, or force the victim to perform undesired requests in the SAP […]

Customers

Newsletter