GDPR 2018 Piergiorgio Venuti

GDPR: what’s new and what’s old

GDPR 2018: what’s new and what’s old.

In my work as a privacy professional I have dealt with companies and public administrations that – those with more effort and effort, those with less – have tried to adapt to the so-called “privacy” regulations that have taken place over the last twenty years. But when I happened to meet these companies after a while, I discovered that all those efforts – big or small they were – had no following: a magnificent castle was built but no maintenance was done , and that castle fell to pieces, in some cases it no longer exists and many do not know if it ever existed.

So when I think of the GDPR and all those who are concerned with the changes that this introduces and the investments that will need to be made to adapt, in short, when my clients ask me how much this new castle will cost them, I would rather say than think what will be needed to invest in building the castle (new software, new technologies) will be more important to think about later, how to organize and maintain their processes, how to keep their people up to date, how to verify, monitor that data are treated in the respect for the principles, that the effectiveness of the security measures is always adequate in relation to the evolution of the threats and the new treatments that the companies put in place.

Yes, because in the GDPR there is little new as to prescriptions (the GDPR has not so much prescriptive character), there is instead a lot of new in terms of principles and responsibilities.

One of the key principles of the GDPR 2018 is in fact that of accountability, of accountability.

In fact, the Owner is responsible for any decision on the appropriate measures to be prepared, and the measures are established on the basis of the results of the risk analysis (and this is not new, remember the DPSS whose compulsory had been canceled in our legal system?). And the risk analysis must be done on the treatments, it is necessary to draw up a Register of Treatments (The DPSS foresaw a census of the treatments, even here nothing new …).

But security measures, treatment processes, are not something static. Moreover it may happen that not all organization is constant in applying principles and measures in daily practice.

Here then the GDPR requires that the effectiveness of the measures is monitored, that the application of the principles is verified: this has only one name, which in the Italian version of the GDPR has been translated in an abrupt manner in three different ways. This name is AUDIT: here’s what you have to keep doing.

And much attention must also be done when designing new measures, new treatments: it will be necessary to respect the key principles of privacy by design and privacy by default.

And for the most risky treatments (those that are operated on data that are risky for the freedom and dignity of the data subjects, health data, biometric data, genetic data …), an Impact Assessment must be carried out before starting the treatment. The current legislation provides for a notification to the Guarantor, an act that is usually only bureaucratic: the GDPR asks for something more complicated, which goes to intersect with the principle of accountability: it is always the owner who is responsible for carrying out an evaluation impact and decide on the measures.

In conclusion, in GDPR 2018 there is a lot of old, already present in the current legislation, although in some cases a bit ‘hidden between the lines, but often less hidden in the measures of the Guarantor. The real news, as we have seen, lies in the responsibility, in the need – even in the obligation – to do maintenance, and it is precisely there that also go to fit the new (those yes!) And much heavier penalties.

Paolo Raimondi, Privacy Officer and Privacy Consultant

GDPR 2018

 

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

Almost ready for the GDPR

Cyber Risk Insurance

Introducing a set of new GDPR tools

New European regulation (GDPR)

Privacy

Stay in control of your fast-moving, quick-shifting data

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Dark Reading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Backdoor.Win32.Delf.eg / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution October 3, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Oct 03Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/de6220a8e8fcbbee9763fb10e0ca23d7.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Delf.eg Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Description: The malware listens on TCP port 7401. Third-party adversarys who can reach infected systems can issue commands made available by the...
  • Backdoor.Win32.NTRC / Weak Hardcoded Credentials October 3, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Oct 03Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/273fd3f33279cc9c0378a49cf63d7a06.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.NTRC Vulnerability: Weak Hardcoded Credentials Family: NTRC Type: PE32 MD5: 273fd3f33279cc9c0378a49cf63d7a06 Vuln ID: MVID-2022-0646 Disclosure: 10/02/2022 Description: The malware listens on TCP port 6767....
  • Wordpress plugin - WPvivid Backup - CVE-2022-2863. October 3, 2022
    Posted by Rodolfo Tavares via Fulldisclosure on Oct 03=====[ Tempest Security Intelligence - ADV-15/2022 ]========================== Wordpress plugin - WPvivid Backup - Version < 0.9.76 Author: Rodolfo Tavares Tempest Security Intelligence - Recife, Pernambuco - Brazil =====[ Table of Contents]================================================== * Overview * Detailed description * Timeline of disclosure * Thanks & Acknowledgements * References =====[ […]
  • ZKBioSecurity 3.0.5- Privilege Escalation to Admin (CVE-2022-36634) October 1, 2022
    Posted by Caio B on Sep 30#######################ADVISORY INFORMATION####################### Product: ZKSecurity BIO Vendor: ZKTeco Version Affected: 3.0.5.0_R CVE: CVE-2022-36634 Vulnerability: User privilege escalation #######################CREDIT####################### This vulnerability was discovered and researched by Caio Burgardt and Silton Santos. #######################INTRODUCTION####################### Based on the hybrid biometric technology and...
  • ZKBiosecurity - Authenticated SQL Injection resulting in RCE (CVE-2022-36635) October 1, 2022
    Posted by Caio B on Sep 30#######################ADVISORY INFORMATION####################### Product: ZKSecurity BIO Vendor: ZKTeco ( https://www.zkteco.com/en/ZKBiosecurity/ZKBioSecurity_V5000_4.1.2) Version Affected: 4.1.2 CVE: CVE-2022-36635 Vulnerability: SQL Injection (with a plus: RCE) #######################CREDIT####################### This vulnerability was discovered and researched by Caio Burgardt and Silton Santos....
  • Backdoor.Win32.Augudor.b / Remote File Write Code Execution September 27, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/94ccd337cbdd4efbbcc0a6c888abb87d.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Augudor.b Vulnerability: Remote File Write Code Execution Description: The malware drops an empty file named "zy.exe" and listens on TCP port 810. Third-party adversaries who can reach the infected […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Psychward.b / Weak Hardcoded Credentials September 27, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/0b8cf90ab9820cb3fcb7f1d1b45e4e57.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Psychward.b Vulnerability: Weak Hardcoded Credentials Description: The malware listens on TCP port 8888 and requires authentication. However, the password "4174" is weak and hardcoded in cleartext within the PE...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Bingle.b / Weak Hardcoded Credentials September 27, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 27Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/eacaa12336f50f1c395663fba92a4d32.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Bingle.b Vulnerability: Weak Hardcoded Credentials Description: The malware is packed using ASPack 2.11, listens on TCP port 22 and requires authentication. However, the password "let me in" is weak […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20220923-0 :: Multiple Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities in COVESA (Connected Vehicle Systems Alliance) DLT daemon September 27, 2022
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab, Research via Fulldisclosure on Sep 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20220923-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities product: COVESA DLT daemon (Diagnostic Log and Trace) Connected Vehicle Systems Alliance (COVESA), formerly GENIVI vulnerable version:
  • Backdoor.Win32.Hellza.120 / Authentication Bypass September 20, 2022
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 19Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2022 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/2cbd0fcf4d5fd5fb6c8014390efb0b21_B.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: twitter.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Hellza.120 Vulnerability: Authentication Bypass Description: The malware listens on TCP ports 12122, 21. Third-party adversarys who can reach infected systems can logon using any username/password combination....

Customers

Newsletter